Docket No. 3550 - Implementation of the Requirements s of the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Order - and Docket No. 2681 - TELRIC Studies (Hot Cuts). Docket No. 3550 - Implementation of the Requirements s of the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Order - and Docket No. 2681 - TELRIC Studies (Hot Cuts). Some of the testimony filed in this docket is exempt from public disclosure. The testimony published on this page has been redacted for public viewing. Updated 03/31/04 1) Commission's Memoranda, Scheduling Announcements and Orders: Notice of Implementation Partial Procedural Schedule for Docket - Phase I - No Petition for Impairment was filed. Discovery Procedure for Phase II - Mass Market Switching, Transport & Loops Commission issues Order No. 17790 granting a temporary stay of the TRO and hot cut proceeding, and to maintain the status quo for UNEs. (3.26.04) 2) Motions to Intervene, Comments Regarding Procedure & Discovery, Protective Agreement: Cox RI Telcom LLC Intervention & Cox RI Telcom LLC Comments MCI WorldCom Inc Intervention & MCI WorldCom Comments Conversent Communications of RI Comments & Conversent Intervention AT&T Communications of RI & AT&T Communications of RI Comments Verizon Rhode Island Intervention and Comments RNK, Inc. Intervention Motion to Establish Procedures Regarding Confidential Information 3) Motion for Stay of Further Proceeding, Intervernors' Replies and Related Filings: Verizon's Motion for Stay Further Proceeding (3/3/04) Verizon's amendment to motion and request to stay proceeding relating to hot cut issues (3/10/04) Verizon's brief response to comments submitted in opposition (3/15/04) AT&T's Opposition to Verizon's Motion (3/5/04) AT&T's Opposition to Motion for Stay Hot Cut Portion of Proceeding (3/15/04) AT&T's letter noting State of Michigan's recent decision denying SBC's Motion for Stay (3/16/04) MCI's Opposition to Verizon's Motion for Stay (3/12/04) Conversent Objection to Verizon's Motion for Stay (3/12/04) Conversent's letter supporting AT&T's position regarding hot cuts (3/16/04) Covad's comments opposing Verizon's Motion for Stay (3/10/04) DSCI & InfoHighway Opposition to Verizon's Motion for Stay (3/5/04) Division's response to Verizon's and Intervenor's pleadings (3/15/04) 4) Testimony & Motions filed by Verizon RI regarding Phase II: Direct Panel Testimony & Attachments of VRI (Mass Market Switching, Transport and Loops Direct Panel Testimony & Attachments of VRI (Hot Cut Process and Scability) Direct Testimony & Attachments of William E. Taylor 5) Testimony filed by AT&T Communications & Broadview Networks: Rebuttal Testimony of Jack P. Lynott (Self-provisioning and Wholesale Triggers for Dedicated Transport) for AT&T Direct Testimony of William Lehr, Ph.D (Economic Framework for Trigger Analysis & Mass Market Switching for AT&T Rebuttal Testimony of William Salvatore (Hot Cuts) for AT&T Rebuttal Testimony of Matthew G. Mercurio, Ph.D (Hot Cuts) for AT&T Reply Testimony of Robert P. Flappan (Hot Cuts) for AT&T Reply Testimony of William and Richard Walsh (Hot Cuts Process and Scability) for AT&T Panel Testimony of Michael Hou, Brenda Kahn and Richard Walsh (Bulk Hot Cuts) for AT&T and Broadview Networks 6) Testimony filed by MCI WorldCom: Rebuttal Testimony of Sherry Lichtenberg (Mass Market Switching) Rebuttal Testimony of Michael D. Pelcovitz (Trigger Analysis & Mass Market Switching) Rebuttal Testimony of Earle Jenkins (Hot Cuts) Responsive Testimony of Earle Jenkins (Hot Cuts and Scability) 7) Testimony filed by Conversent Communications of RI: Rebuttal Testimony of David A. Graham (Unbundled Transport) Panel Rebuttal Testimony by August Ankum, Ph.D. and Sidney Morrison (Hot Cuts) 8) Testimony filed by Covad Communications: Rebuttal Testimony of Valerie Cardwell (Direct Loop/Transport) Rebuttal Testimony of Valerie Cardwell (Hot Cuts) Rebuttal Testimony of Valerie Cardwell and Michael Clancy (Direct Switching) 9) Comments of DSCI Communications & InhoHighway Communications Corp.